Frontier01_Iconoclast - TRACES_Boksburg 2020

Project brief 

"This first project serves as a personal primer, the layer onto which the projects and processes to come will bind onto, or come unstuck from. The aim of this exercise is for you to locate yourself within your own personal development. 

You are tasked to answer one question – Where are you now? – by representing your personal progress in the field of Architecture, projected into the future, within clear physical constraints."

TRACES_Boksburg 2020

Mama's Journal

Boksburg, my home town since the earliest stages of childhood, reflects a spatial allegory of my current position related to architecture. 

Often misunderstood by outsiders (and some insiders), the historic town leaves its impression, traced through life and architecture. I explore five predominant spatial typologies and their hybrid relationships: mining heritage (comparable to traces & history), plantation (the soil), industry (process & production), suburbs and townships (expression & perceptions), and the CBD (complexity & ambition). 

This typological investigation of Boksburg embodies different, yet synchronized, aspects of my architectural progression. 

Simon Ngubeni

Snapshot of Boksburg 2020

Presenting Frontier 1 at MOAD

UNIT13: Introductory Task

The first introductory task is to interpret and translate our understanding of the Unit13 presentation given by Eric and Claudia on the opening day of Unit System Africa 2016 in any medium. 

I understood the idea of Frontiers as referring to uncharted territory, an undiscovered field of knowledge or anything inviting exploration.

In this discussion, the Frontiers we face relate to the current and rapidly transforming environment and society that we find ourselves operating in as (aspirant) architects. 

With this frontier, come the frontiers of what the actions and roles of the architect are, or are to be, in responding and adapting to this complex setting, considering the idea of a collective intelligence as an important part a progression in praxis to be explored.

This montage is an attempt to represent these frontiers.  

These thoughts call for a critical consideration of the various Frontiers of the self, others, the performance etc... which will be explored through the various projects of the year and eventually the Major Design Project. 

Unit System Africa 2016: Introduction Week1

This year begins with a whole new set of Units at the UJ Graduate school of architecture (GSA). Day 1 has included making the decision for which top 3 (of 5) units to join for the year, as well as interviews by the unit leaders.

The new set of units are below (the bold were my top 3).
11. Politics and Poetics
12. The Eclectic Atlasses
13. Frontiers 
14. Radical negotiations/ Emergent Spatialities Johannesburg
15. Regenerative Urban Landscapes 

My first selection was Unit13: Frontiers, led by Eric Wright and Claudia Margado, and this is the unit I will be a part of for the year 2016.

"Unit 13 is interested in identifying new spaces for the ‘Architect’ through an investigation into PRAXIS; in pursuit of plural modes of practice. PRAXIS, simply put, is how theory is

implemented, which in architecture means building buildings, or however you choose ‘to do’

This studio investigates the potential for meaningful practice within this shifting context (of cities), adopting an ideological shift from genius to scenius. "Scenius stands for the intelligence and the intuition of a whole cultural scene. It is the communal form of the concept of the genius." (B. Eno)." Extracts from Unit13 Course outline

Part of why I chose this unit was because of what I feel it will offer my for my exit year, before entering into practice  as an architect. "We are really looking for students who are interested in relevance, passionate about purpose and hungry to do great work..." Although a bit paraphrased, but this statement (said Eric during unit presentations) sealed my decision.

I really look forward to seeing what this new year and Unit has in store, and more importantly seeing what I could bring to the table in the Units journey of exploration into new Frontiers.

.

Architectural Manifesto - Video

The systemic framework
Architecture exists as a part of the complex, dynamic and self-governing system of the built environment, a part of the built fabric of society in which every day behavior, culture and practices, are intricately related to the notion of place. Thus is defined the architect’s field of operation, which involves peoples individual and collective customs & daily rituals, staged on the platform of space. To this, we hold to these principles:

Recognizing complexity, designing simplicity
Understanding the systemic complexity of the collective users, space, and built form of a place; as well as the unique nature of relationships between these, is a driver for context sensitive spatial design responses. Familiarity with the complexity and processes is a generator for simple, meaningful responses. 

People in mind
A place is not only its material, but also its inhabitants, and their complex, layered practices. Thus the dynamic nature of users (collective and individual) in the making and sustaining of a place is to be kept in mind. 

Designing impact
Understanding the complexity of a context, it is within the reach of spatial designers to make an intentional, considered impact, through design, for the benefit of users. 
What architecture does is just as important as what it is, and more important that what it looks like: if what it looks like does not contribute to what it does (This referring to the effect and impact of architecture, rather that programmatic function).

A catalytic agent 
The complex nature of the built environment is greater than the architect. In designing impact, architecture is thus a catalyst, a means to the end of contributing to the system: spatially, aesthetically, functionally or whatever opportunity a place invites of the spatial designer. The architect is thus contributor and not as controller, and architecture is thus a valuable (yet limited) instrument.

Thesis process video submission

A video submission of the current thesis process. There was a strict 4-minute restriction to summarize the overall narrative of the thesis process upto this stage of the project. 

B-tech final design project

A starting point. Levels of intervention and healing

The socio-spatial wounds of Fietas may be viewed as existing at varying scales. Thus opportunity exists to intervening at different scales. 

Intervening at varying scales may be considered as a multi-level treatment to the spatial woundedness. Through considering the built environment in terms of levels, as well noting the various agents that are active on those levels enables one to also place oneself in the relevant position to intervene. 

While the city of Johannesburg has an overall vision for the city, setting the guidelines (such as the corridors of freedom development) for the levels below, for the sake of this project, the delimitation of intervention are within the neighbourhood scale of Pageview and Vrededorp.

 A starting point

The public realm, the shared spaces of the neighborhood of Fietas is the starting point for intervention in healing the socio-spatial wounds. This refers to the shared spaces at a neighbourhood scale. 

Whilst being on major routes to and through the city, the neighbourhood is not programattically benefiting from that proximity. These are factors are all seen as opportunities in seeking to design towards a sens of spatial balance and well-being, healing the spatial wounds of the neighborhood. 

The demolished sites that remain also hold potential in being redeveloped and offer opportunities for new spatial and programmatic interventions relevant to the context. These also hold opportunities to capture and spatially represent the rich history of the neighbourhood.  

Neighborhood Framework

In considering the notion of “comprehensive” treatment, a multi-layered approach is adopted in the proposals at an urban scale.

Among these layers include the first stages of development taking place within the major routes of Fietas (8th, 14th and 17th street moving from East and West,, as well as Krause, De-la-rey and Solomon Street from North and South). These major routes frame smaller “sub-neighbourhoods” within Fietas which all bear a unique and distinct character, while also serving as linkages.

Developments meeting at an intersection provide opportunity for mixed use developments, The intersection on 8th Street and Krause street is where one finds opportunity for intervention.